15.12.2012 9:51, Miika Komu kirjoitti:
Hi,
On 12/15/2012 09:40 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Ari Keranen
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 5:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Fwd: Status of WG items
Or we can do this.
However, I would not be too concerned for the CERT draft blocking the
reg draft given that the CERT draft should not require much (any?)
changes for STD track. Of course that would need someone driving that
work too.
If there's not enough interest for that work (I think it's important
but don't have the cycles to do it myself), it makes sense to go
forward as proposed below.
I agree with the above. I would support carrying them forward as is
and trying to publish together, but if the authors prefer to decouple,
I would be fine with that approach.
I would also suggest pushing CERT draft to the standards track if the
authors can contribute some cycles.
I can contribute some cycles.
BR,
Samu
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
