Hi,
On 03/26/2013 01:18 PM, Petri Jokela wrote:
>Section 6 should update the HIP protocol number to 139 (from 253).
>
>Do we want to reference the tunneling of ESP over UDP?
Here I cannot say anything. Any opinions from others?
how are the RFCs bundled together for the standards track, or would this
create an undesired dependencies? If it creates such a dependency, can
it be avoided by referencing NAT specification as informational?
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
