On 06/30/2014 04:55 AM, Francis Dupont wrote:
In your previous mail you wrote:
Hi all, we received a number of comments during the IESG evaluation of
RFC 5201-bis. Below are the non-editorial comments. There were also
several IANA questions that I plan to handle in a separate message.
=> as a co-author of RFC 4843bis I found a mismatch between 4843bis,
section 3.2 and appendix E... (PS: my proposal is to follow 3.2,
add "truncated " in the 4843bis example, and cleanup the table 11
of appendix E).
Francis,
I had a look at appendix E but couldn't determine what you are
suggesting be changed; could you propose some specific text?
While we are on this topic, Tom Taylor had suggested as an editorial
comment:
"Appendix E, opening sentence: ORCHID prefix is now 23 bits, not 28 bits."
but I believe that this is not correct (ORCHID prefix will eventually be
28 bits long out of the 2001::/23 space, if I am not mistaken).
- Tom
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
