This issue with RFC5201-bis is being tracked as issue 48: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/48
When a HIP association is in state CLOSING and new data arrives to send to the peer, Table 7 states to send another I1 but stay in CLOSING, while our state machine diagram implies that there is a transition to state I1-SENT.
I propose to fix this by changing the Table 7 to read that the state machine transitions to state I1-SENT in this case.
Any comments or objections? - Tom _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
