Hi, I am resending Petri's comments below.
Cheers, Gonzalo On 15/02/2016 8:08 AM, Petri Jokela wrote: > Hi, > > I read through the draft (draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal) and from > technical perspective it seems to be ok. Some thoughts about the > document itself: > > HIP Relay server came up suddenly and it was hard to understand the > operation of the node. At some point I also mixed HIP data relay and > HIP relay server. Which node is doing NATting? A short intro that would > explain the operation of these nodes would help. > > The same issue came up with Address candidates. Reading the referenced > document might help, but now the document does not give direct > understanding what candidates we are looking after. Again, a short intro > makes it clearer. > > Flow charts would help to understand the message exchange. > > In general, the document refers a lot to other RFCs. My suggestion is to > check the document and add some introductory sentences for > clarifications whenever a “new” node or operation is introduced. > > Petri > > -- > Petri Jokela > Senior researcher > NomadicLab, Ericsson Research > Oy L M Ericsson Ab > > E-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Mobile: +358 44 299 2413 > > > _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
