Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-10: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't believe IANA Considerations section is correct: it points to a document that gets obsoleted by this one, yet the original document creates new subregistries. This makes the status of earlier established registries unclear. Also, other sections have references to Section 7 (e.g. for registration types) which no longer contain relevant information. I think you should copy the original IANA registration section in its entirety and clearly mark new allocations in it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I found the "changed since" Appendix, so never mind that ;-) It would be good if the document said that a registration type is 1 octet without the need to look at the packet diagrams or IANA registration text from RFC 5203 that you deleted. _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
