On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Varjonen Samu
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for the delayed answer to the comment.
>
> The MAY is there to keep the options free to move on with the exchange
> regardless of unverifyable or missing certificate in cases where the certs
> are optional. Or in case the certificates are not for setting up a
> connection but serve as a general mechanism to communicate roles or
> capabilities, in which enforcing an error message may not be what is wanted.
>
> However, error signaling could be RECOMMENDED instead of MAY as it would
> still allow to omit error signaling.

I'll leave this up to you, the WG and AD.  Your response makes sense
and it was just a comment.

Thanks,
Kathleen
>
> -Samu & Tobias
>
>
> On 05/07/16 04:08, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
>>
>> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-08: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Why is MAY used int he error handling and not MUST or listing these
>> actions as RECOMMENDED?
>>
>> Thanks for addressing the SecDir review:
>> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06366.html
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hipsec mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

Reply via email to