What is 'co called' in this text:
o In ICE, the conflict when two communicating end-points take the
same controlling role is solved using random values (co called
tie-breaker value). In this protocol, the conflict is solved by
the standard HIP base exchange procedure, where the host with the
"larger" HIT switches to Responder role, thus changing also to
controlled role.
Should it be 'so called'?
I will continue reading...
Bob
On 11/24/2016 05:37 AM, Miika Komu wrote:
Hi,
I read the latest version of the ICE specs. Based on this, I included
more details on ICE processing to the HIP NAT traversal draft. A quick
summary of the changes:
* Introduced more details from ice-bis draft
* New terminology
* Aligned connectivity check procedure to match with ICE (3-way
check is now 4-way)
* Ta minimum value is now 5 ms (according to ICE bis)
* 4.9 Handoff: first update HIP relay to in order learn new server
reflexive locators
* New sections:
* 4.6.3. Rules for Concluding Connectivity Checks
* 6.6. Amplification attacks (new section)
* 6.7. Attacks against Connectivity Checks and Candidate Gathering
* Appendix C. Differences to ICE
* Appendix D. Differences to Base Exchange and UPDATE procedures
* 7. IANA Considerations: added UNSAF considerations (references ICE)
* updated references (some drafts are now RFCs)
Feedback is welcome! For people already familiar with HIP, I'd
recommend reading "the diff to normal HIP" in section
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-14#appendix-D
On 11/24/2016 10:32 AM, [email protected] wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol of the IETF.
Title : Native NAT Traversal Mode for the Host
Identity Protocol
Authors : Ari Keranen
Jan Melén
Miika Komu
Filename : draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-14.txt
Pages : 51
Date : 2016-11-24
Abstract:
This document specifies a new Network Address Translator (NAT)
traversal mode for the Host Identity Protocol (HIP). The new mode is
based on the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) methodology
and UDP encapsulation of data and signaling traffic. The main
difference from the previously specified modes is the use of HIP
messages for all NAT traversal procedures.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-14
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-14
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
