Miika, > now it says: > > It SHOULD wait for all of them to respond for a configurable time, by > default two minutes, and then continue with the handover procedure...
OK, various changes look good. >> Is it possible then to have no valid locators here, due to the SPI >> collision? What will happen then? > The hosts will anyway send their local locators and server reflexive > ones, and only the relayed one must be omitted. So, this means that no > connectivity if NAT traversal fails. Remember that this is just a back > up plan which the data relay client executes only when it fails to > register for a new relayed candidate *and* the SPI would conflict. In > other words, a data relay client MAY reuse server relayed candidates > only if SPI does not conflict. > > (I did not correct anything related to this, let me know explicitly if > you would like to see some changes) OK, thanks for the explanation. I don’t think any further changes are needed here. -Jeff _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
