OK, lets get some discussion here...

Only 32 people signed up for tm-rid list.  Of course if things work out, the discussion moves here; hopefully that will be a good thing.

I have requested a tm-rid BOF; I would appreciate it if I were to get some interest in others here and commitments to attend the BOF. Here is a rough agenda:

5 min Agenda bashing (ya got to bash at the agenda.  Its a tradition).
10 min UAS background (RemoteID, NetworkID, and Command & Control)
10 min UAS/HIP use case
10 min Hierarchical HITs and HIT Registries
5 min New Crypto in HIP (and new ESP Transform: Diet-ESP and Keyak cipher)
10 min RemoteID HIP Authenticated Messages
5 min Hackathon report (If we can get some people working on those messages and C2 protection)
5 min Next steps (updated HIP charter) and Q&A

Is that too packed?  Did I leave anything out?  Should I ask for 90min?

The IESG will be looking for activity here to gauge the interest/activity.

Bob

On 9/20/19 4:45 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Dear HIPsters,

I am in discussion with Ganzalo and Eric about a HIP session in Singapore.

The focus is the new work to support "Trustworthy Multipurpose RemoteID" with the target user of UAS.

This week I attended the nuair.org UAS Symposium outside of Syracuse NY and received considerable support for HITs as RemoteIDs (along with the other expected formats).  This effort has funding from CLUE (I was told what that means and what piece of legislation set it up, but...).

I have the 1st versions of the 1st 3 drafts.  More to follow.

I would like to see hackathon efforts at Singapore (unfortunately we cannot fly drones in the hackathon room, perhaps we can get them suspended from the ceiling).  Also including HIPv2 software interop testing.

It is early to actually have an agenda, but the question is:

When during the week.
How long a session.

Eric was thinking a short session on Friday.

I will be there for the whole week, so Friday morning works for me. Who would also be there.  Who could not.

A short session at the end of the week SHOULD be ok.

What about earlier in the week?  Who would attend?  What are conflicts (SAAG, CFRG)?

Eric needs to move forward on scheduling deadlines are coming up. Please chime in.

Bob

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

Reply via email to