Robert Moskowitz <[email protected]> wrote: > I would actually like to make a presentation at SAAG about KMAC as a KDF and > why the IETF should incorporate it.
> SP 800-185 was published back in Dec 2016. This clearly shows how to use
> KMAC as a replacement for HMAC. Many in the security community 'rejected'
> SHA3 as only marginally faster than SHA256. They missed that thus KMAC is
2x
> as fast as HMAC-SHA256!
I guess you saying that KMAC does not require two passes of the underlying
hash when used with SHA3? Or is it in general?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
