When responding about the primary fixative being alcohol, I was also 
referencing HQIP Participant Summary from 2007 which states "Cell shrinkage and 
nuclear bubbling, artifacts induced by aggressive processing schedules with 
resulting primary fixation largely in alcohols". (It's weird, I do actually 
read these things!) I know for us this was endometrial tissue/ small biopsies 
that was evaluated and the infiltration of fixative was not long enough (even 
core breast bx's are now recommended to be included in the no less than 6 hour 
fixative time frame for Her2 testing). So looking at your fixation processing 
times may be of help. This is just what has helped the quality of our tissue 
sections in our lab as we tend to rush these small biopsies through.  Fyi,  
Phyllis

I do have a question though, now that I'm on the subject of the HQIP surveys.  
Did anyone read the comment on the AFB staining from HQIP-B 2007 final critique 
pg. 18??  I keep waiting for some further feed back about IHC for AFB.  They 
mention IHC sensitivity is 74%-100% whereas the traditional special is only 
36%-44% (they made it sound like labs are doing this IHC routinely).  Their 
reference is to the Indian Journal of Tuberculosis.  I have called all of our 
major vendors and they are not aware of a monoclonal antibody to 38k da protein 
of mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.  I just don't understand why CAP would 
recommend something that I cannot find readily available on the market. Any 
comments??    

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gudrun Lang
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: AW: [Histonet] Question RE: HQIP Result 

Schaundra,
In the following publication Fox describes bubbles that occur in cultered cells 
after 5-30 min after the addition of formaldehyd solution.
Fox Cecil H ua., Formaldehyd Fixation; J. of. Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 
33(8):845-853, 1985

So bubbles could be a sign of very short fixation.
Gudrun Lang

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Schaundra Walton
Gesendet: Montag, 01. Dezember 2008 18:58
An: Histonet
Betreff: [Histonet] Question RE: HQIP Result 

We just got our HQIP results and they made a comment regarding the breast 
tissue H&E slide we submitted.  Can someone please tell me what nuclear 
bubbling artifact is and what causes it?  
 
Thanks!
Schaundra Walton BS, HTL (ASCP)
Histology Supervisor
Swedish American Hospital
Rockford, IL


      
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The information in this communication is intended to be confidential to the 
Individual(s) and/or Entity to whom it is addressed.
It may contain information of a Privileged and/or Confidential nature, which is 
subject to Federal and/or State privacy regulations.
In the event that you are not the intended recipient or the agent of the 
intended recipient, do not copy or use the information
contained within this communication, or allow it to be read, copied or utilized 
in any manner, by any other person(s). Should
this communication be received in error, please notify the sender immediately 
either by response e-mail or by phone,
and permanently delete the original e-mail, attachment(s), and any copies.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

Reply via email to