Tracy,

I used to work at the same (nameless) place with Mr. Saby and I concur.  In my 
opinion your colleagues are potentially causing harm to the tissue specimens 
(especially small, delicate ones) while you are not.  Hot paraffin, specimens 
of various tissue types (particularly animal) and the resultant heat transfer 
is less than optimal.  Consider...why is it so important to get your specimens 
off the processor(s) shortly after the run(s) have been completed?  
Answer...you don't want to "cook" them in liquid paraffin on the final station. 
 So why cook them in a holding tank full of liquid paraffin while you embed?  
Also, the tissues (ideally) have been properly fixed, processed and 
infiltrated.  No harm will befall them without liquid paraffin, until they are 
embedded.

Good luck,
Tom Jasper

Thomas Jasper HT (ASCP) BAS
Histology Supervisor
Central Oregon Regional Pathology Services
Bend, OR 97701
541/693-2677
tjas...@copc.net

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Joseph Saby
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 3:04 PM
To: Tracy Bergeron; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] question of the day - embedding

Tracy-

Where I used to work (at a place that shall remain nameless), we always kept 
our tissue being embedded in hot paraffin in the holding chamber.  Most of my 
work has been with animal tissues.

Where I work now, we don't.  And I do bellieve you are right.  If the tissues 
remain in hot paraffin, the heat transfer rate is very high, and the tissues 
continue to "cook" even when the chamber temperature has been reduced (as close 
as feasible) to the melting point of the paraffin.  I have seen little effect 
on the tissues of longer-than-I-would-like time in the holding chamber without 
paraffin.  Without the paraffin, the tissues do not get that direct heat from 
the melted paraffin and survive delay much better.

In short, I agree with you.  Not keeping the tissue in hot paraffin does not 
only not damage those tissues, it allows more flexiblity in your embedding 
times.

Joe Saby, BA HT




________________________________
From: Tracy Bergeron <tracy.berge...@biogenidec.com>
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 4:14:46 PM
Subject: [Histonet] question of the day - embedding

Hi all question/dilemma of the day.

        I have been of the view that the longer tissue sat in melted paraffin 
the harder it got, especially animal tissue.  So with that said, for the past 
nearly 10 years I have not used melted paraffin in the holding chamber of the 
embedding center.  I just keep the chamber warm, and work that way.  Thus 
keeping the tissue from continuing to cook and harden in the wax.

        Everyone else I am currently working with has never seen the method I 
use, and firmly believe that this causes harm to the tissues if they are not in 
paraffin.

        Thoughts ideas etc.  I am dying to know if I am the only one that 
worries about length of time that animal tissue sits in paraffin.

Thanks.

Sincerely,
Tracy E. Bergeron, B.S., HT, HTL (ASCP)
Associate Scientist III, Pathology
Comparative Pathology Laboratory
Biogen Idec
14 Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
Direct:  617-914-1115
Fax:  617-679-3208
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



      
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

Reply via email to