Thanks,  Joe  and  Adam. I'm always paranoid about over tightening and
   warping  some  piece of the equipment but maybe I'm being a little too
   gentle.  I'll  make  sure  everything  is nice and snug and see how it
   goes.
   Happy slicing...
   Nate
   Galbraith, Joe wrote:

Nathan:

As indicated by others - first check that everything is tight as that is
most often the issue - don't forget to check the adhesion of the
specimen to the chuck as well.  Also check the angle of approach to the
blade as it could be too steep or too shallow.

If everything is tight and properly adjusted, then you may have a
retraction issue.  If your cryostat retracts during the upstroke, the
head may still be returning to the proper distance from the head to the
specimen during the downstroke and hence you may see no section at first
and then a gradually increasing thickness of section during the
remainder of the downstroke.  This can be due to two causes: 1) You can
make this happen by operating the microtome at too high of a speed, if
you slow down and the process improves then speed may be a factor; 2)
Your microtome may be sticky and require maintenance (defrosting,
cleaning, lubrication, etc.).  The latter is best left to someone with
extensive experience or a service rep.

Good luck.

Joe Galbraith
University of Iowa
[1][email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: [2][email protected]
[[3]mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam .
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:53 PM
To: Nathan Cramer
Cc: [4][email protected]
Subject: Re: [Histonet] uneven alternating sections on cryostat

I was having this problem too, but I think I finally figured it out.
There
is a screw on our cryostat that attaches the chuck to the rest of the
machine. This screws fits into a small hole in the chuck. Sometimes the
screw isn't well set in the hole or is well set but for some reason
comes
loose and causes the chuck to wobble. For some reason, this causes your
problem. Now I make sure that everything is tightly secured, and I
rarely
have this problem.

Good luck,
Adam

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Nathan Cramer [5]<[email protected]>
wrote:



  Thanks, Robyn... I'll make sure the holder is clamped down.


(sometimes


  its the little things...)
  Best
  Nate
   R J VAZQUEZ wrote:

    Nathan,
    It sounds like the blade holder is not secure enough or even in


the


    tightness on each side.
    Hope this helps.
    Robyn

    > Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:44:11 -0400
     > From: [[6]1][email protected]
    > To: [[7]2][email protected]
     > Subject: [Histonet] uneven alternating sections on cryostat
    >
    > When cutting PFA fixed, cryoprotected tissue on our cryostat, I
    >  frequently  find  that  every other section gets cut


improperly.


    I'll get
    >  one nicely cut section and then on the next pass I only get


half


    of a
    >  section. This cycle simply repeats over and over and I lose


many


    slices.
    > It has been a while since our cryostat has been serviced, so I'm
    >  wondering  if  this  an  operator  error or a machine problem.


I


    thought
    >  maybe  the  tissue  temperature hadn't settled properly, but


the


    uneven
    >  cutting  still  happens  even  when  I let the tissue sit for


30


    minutes in
    > the chuck holder. (cutting mouse spinal cord at -20C)
    >
    >  On another note, if anyone has any tips for improving


white/gray


    matter
    >  contrast  in frozen spinal cord sections stained with luxol


fast


    blue,
    >  I'd  be very appreciative. I do defat the slices with


chloroform


    and
    >  differentiate  with  lithium carbonate but everything is


usually


    either
    >  very  dark  or  very  light. I am learning as I go (checking


the


    archives
    > here often) so any help would be great.
    >
    > Thanks!
    >
    > Nathan Cramer
    > Neurobiology and Behavior
    > Cornell University
    > Ithaca, NY 14853
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Histonet mailing list
     > [[8]3][email protected]
    > [4][9]http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

References

  1. [10]mailto:[email protected]
  2. [11]mailto:[email protected]
  3. [12]mailto:[email protected]
  4. [13]http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
[14][email protected]
[15]http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
[16][email protected]
[17]http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. mailto:[email protected]
   3. mailto:[email protected]
   4. mailto:[email protected]
   5. mailto:[email protected]
   6. mailto:1][email protected]
   7. mailto:2][email protected]
   8. mailto:3][email protected]
   9. http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
  10. mailto:[email protected]
  11. mailto:[email protected]
  12. mailto:[email protected]
  13. http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
  14. mailto:[email protected]
  15. http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
  16. mailto:[email protected]
  17. http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

Reply via email to