We have used 6F11 in the past and have switched to SP1. In running parallel tests, we noticed about a 97% concordance between the two.
Good luck. Ashley Troutman BS, HT(ASCP) QIHC Vanderbilt University Histopathology 1301 Medical Center Drive TVC 4532 Nashville, TN 37232 615-343-9134 ________________________________________ From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of histonet-requ...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [histonet-requ...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 12:00 PM To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: Histonet Digest, Vol 77, Issue 29 -----Original Message----- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Taylor, Jean Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:17 AM To: 'ih...@googlegroups.com'; 'histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu' Subject: [Histonet] ER clone 1D5 or SP1 ? I'm wondering which clone of ER most labs are using? Thanks, Jean Taylor, HT(ASCP)QIHC IHC Tech Meriter Health Services Madison, WI _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
