If  you  are a brand new lab, how do you validate IHC if you are no= t
   yet  receiving patient specimens?  Can the validation be done on cont   rol 
tissues only?




   Sincerely,


   Tonia Richmond, AS, HT (ASCP)
   Chief Operations Officer = / Laboratory
   Grace Pathology
   PH:  (501) 765-7367
   Email: = [1]tonia.= richm...@gracepathology.com



   -----histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu wrote: -----
   <= /FONT>

     To:        "thisis...@=        aol.com"        <thisis...@aol.com>,
     "histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu" <     
;histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
     From: "McMahon, Loralee A" <Lo= ralee_mcma...@urmc.rochester.edu>
     Sent by: histonet-boun...@lists.u= tsouthwestern.edu
     Date: 04/28/2010 02:01PM
     Subject: RE: [Histonet] Re= sponses to IHC CAP Validation question
     Any  inspection  that  I have under= gone we have used the 25 to 30
     case  rule.   Except  for  the Er/Pr//Her-2= .  We use closer to 50
     cases.   We  also  use  a  TMA to make our live= s easier.  The TMA
     contains known positives and known negatives.
     I=  n  cases of t-cell or b-cell markers or cytokeratins.  25 to 30
     cases  i= s easy.  But when you are validated for more hard to find
     markers  (SV-= 40) then fewer cases is acceptable.  We always throw
     in  a slide that w= e know will not stain for sv-40 like a tonsil -
     then you can say it has spe= cificity.
     Any  inspector that I have come across is usually understanding= of
     this.  But I am sure that there are exceptions to this.........esp     
ecially if they are not familiar with immunohistochemistry.
     Loralee McMahon, HTL (ASCP)
     Immunohistochemistry Supervisor
     Strong M= emorial Hospital
     Department of Surgical Pathology
     (585) 275-7210
          ______________________     5F__= _______________
     From:          histonet-boun...@lis=          ts.utsouthwestern.edu
     [histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu]     On    Behalf=    Of
     thisis...@aol.com [thisis...@aol.com]
     Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 201= 0 2:47 PM
     To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
     Subject: [Histonet] R= esponses to IHC CAP Validation question
     The following is one respone= I rec'd:
     1.   I  asked  CAP  who told me that they do not currentl= y have a
     guideline on
     validating but that they
     recommend what is in t= he following book:
     Quality  Management  In  Anatomic  Pathology,  Promoting  P= atient
     Safety
     Through Systems Improvement and Error
     by Raouf E. Nakhl= eh, MD & Patrick Fitzgibbons, MD editors
     sold by CAP !
     Chapter 8-= Quality Management in IHC
     That is what we follow.
     I. Get a new antib= ody and optimize it with your positive control.
     II.  Once  optimized  you  n= eed to run it on cases expected to be
     positive
     (how many?)
     "a suffien= t size ..."
     III. Must also be run on cases expected to be negative. (how= many?
     IV.  In a situation where you cannot expect a lot of cases or such     a
     case has
     never been presented in your lab, then you must say just = that.
     (ex. some of the hormones we just use a pituitary)
          ___________________     ______________________     5F__= ___
     Histonet mailing list
     Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
     = [2]http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
          ______________________     5F__     ______________________
     Histo= net mailing list
     Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
     [3]http://l= ists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

   
References

   1. 3D"mailto:tonia.richm...@gracepathology.com";
   2. 3D"http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet";
   3. 3D"http://=/
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

Reply via email to