Well, it would be nice if that was the case but we ended up with a deficiency. It was rather disappointing given our overall documentation.
Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 9, 2014, at 4:37 PM, "Sue" <suetp...@comcast.net> wrote: > > So I went to one of the CAP webinars regarding competency And when I asked > what about > > histology there were complete silence on the other end of the line and than > they said there was > > nothing for histology. > > > > At our site they want something for very division so I put together a basic > form and use it > > for the multitude of major tasks in histology. We are not getting inspeted > until next year but > > from what I hear CAP is planning on making major changes for the pathology > protion of > > CAP's checklist, what that means I do not know. > > > > Since CAP canot give us concrete rules for histology I think that anything a > lab does is > > better than nothing, and shows initiative on their part to meet CAP's > requirements. > > Since this is a peer review the inspector can suggest alternatives but > > cannot say you are in violation because the do not "like" your form. > > > > Just my thoughts > > > > S. Paturzo > > TJUH > > > > _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
