We only check and document control slide quality and need for repeat due to control failure.
The pathologist reviewing the slides will send a QC form to us if there is a problem with case slides. Plus thye can enter a repeat for a poor stain as a ""repeat" and we can track the number of repeats in the system. It is actually one of our QA monitors and review of repeats is documented in our quarterly QA review meeting. Tim Morken Supervisor, Histology, Electron Microscopy and Neuromuscular Special Studies UC San Francisco Medical Center San Francisco, CA -----Original Message----- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Jb Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 11:12 AM To: Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: [Histonet] IHC QC forms: Currently we have a IHC QC form for every case that we run. It lists dr, antibody, date, comments, quality results. The HT and pathologist sign off on the quality. Is this necessary for every case or can we do a daily log for all cases? This process is a little time consuming. Does anyone have a good process in place that they can share? Thank you. Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet