We have several prefixes: surgical, cytology, eye pathology, hemepath, autopsy, research (we have many more Specimen Classes but, thankfully, they do not all get separate prefixes). I'm not going to say it is absolutely necessary, just historical here. However, I have never been anywhere that did not have at least cyto and surgical use separate prefixes. I would guess that the larger the institution the more likely it is that there will be more separation. A small institution can combine everything without much problem.
Tim Morken Supervisor, Histology, Electron Microscopy and Neuromuscular Special Studies UC San Francisco Medical Center San Francisco, CA CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged information protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy, or distribute this email message or its attachments. If you believe you have received this email message in error, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. -----Original Message----- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of jessica.va...@hcahealthcare.com Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 7:37 AM To: Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: [Histonet] Combined Case prefix How many facilities have combined their prefixes? Meaning your pathology and cytology are using the same prefix so there is no difference when accessioning cases of pathology or cytology. What do you feel are the pro's and con's of this? Jessica Vacca _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet