We try to be at 0.5% or less. We monitored as a quality indicator for several years and had to modify something to get to that point, but it is pretty steady now. We have new residents constantly rotating into pathology so it is a training issue every month.
Tim Morken Supervisor, Electron Microscopy/Neuromuscular Special Studies Department of Pathology UC San Francisco Medical Center -----Original Message----- From: Cristi Rigazio via Histonet [mailto:histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2019 1:20 PM To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: [Histonet] Benchmarks for Reprocessing > Good afternoon Fellow histonetters! > > I was wondering if there are any tertiary institutions out there that have > set a benchmark for reprocessing tissue? We tend to be less than 1%, but > would love to see what others think is reasonable. > > Thanks for the feedback and hope you all are having an excellent day! > Cristi _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
