When we implemented barcoding I was planning on using direct slide printing. It 
seemed the most efficient and safest way (ie, no mislabelling) to do the 
labeling. 

However, when we looked into getting the printers they were on the order of 
$9,000 per printer. And we wanted 20 printers for histology, cytology, grossing 
(frozens) and the kidney/muscle lab (kidney and muscle frozens) . That was a 
huge part of our equipment budget. In fact it was more than the computers, 
handheld scanners combined. 

So we started looking at slide label printers instead. They are far cheaper - 
on the order of $600 per unit. And we would need label printers for other areas 
as well - accessioning (six sites), grossing (three sites), consults 
slide/block labeling, cytology, EM, etc. 

We demoed both the direct slide printers and label printers. It was good to 
test them side by side because the pros and cons were very apparent. 

Besides the price of the direct slide printers we found they jammed often. They 
did not usually have an adequate output chute for the quantity slides we would 
print (often far more than the 5 or 10-slide capacity of the output chutes 
available. Also, we realized that since we use a few different slides types we 
would need to change slides while printing. That means segregating various 
types of labeled slides and somehow printing separately while needing to change 
out the slides each time. It was  a logistical problem for the cutters. (this 
would be solved via centralized slide printing and routing different stain 
types to their correct slide type thru software. But we wanted to print at the 
microtome for best practice safe labeling of slides where they are cut). Then 
we found that if a the printed label on a slide was somehow damaged (smudged, 
scratched, etc) we would need to print a slide label to fix it. And how do you 
label a slide with a control tissue already mounted - it risks damaging the 
tissue section to run it thru a slide printer (and does the control have a 
label of some sort already?)

Slide labels on the other hand were very flexible. We could print as many as 
needed right away  (in literally a few seconds). Output quantity was not an 
issue. Any damaged could be reprinted right away. We could use any number of 
different types of slides to mount sections and apply the label we had. The 
cost of the labels would take 5 to 10  years to meet the cost of a direct slide 
printer (depending on how many labels any given printer produced per year, and 
by then you would probably move on to new printers anyway). 

We do use a direct slide printer for pre-mounted control slides. Then we put a 
printed label on the slide for staining with the specific stain necessary. 

The one issue I was concerned about was whether the techs would accept having 
to apply labels to every slide (which was previously done after staining by one 
person - with many mistakes!). But during testing and implementation we had 
every tech try out both systems and they did not mind putting on labels. They 
thought it was far better than the hand-writing they had been doing. When we 
went live no one ever complained about putting labels on slides. 

We use the same labels for slides, requisitions and containers so no extra cost 
for different kinds of labels and printers. 

1)      What are you using? Cognitive label printers from General Data and 
StainerShield labels (survive every known histology chemical we have tried, 
including antigen retrieval). 

2)      Did you first try any other vendors besides the one you are using now? 
General Data (printed labels), ThermoFisher SlideMate, ShurMark (etcher - very 
slow printing) (we tried other printed label makers as well but GD was the best 
by far). I will note that when using printed labels you must use a matched 
system - the labels and printers from each vendor are designed to work together 
for the ideal results. Mixing and matching printers and labels is very 
difficult. Since the vendor has already done that, use their system (take it 
from someone who tried to do that!). 

3)      Do you like what you are using now? Very much. It works perfectly. 

4)      Is it a one or two slide hopper - ie can you load and then select 
charged or non-charged slides? No need with printed labels. 

5)      Are you using vendor specific recommended slides or have you 
substituted for a cheaper or other option?  We use various slides. Labels can 
go on any slide. However, with label printing you must used the matched system 
a vendor offers - label and printer are designed to work together for best 
results.

6)      We are looking specifically at Leica, SlideMate and ESPO - do you have 
any experience of info from other users you know about these vendors? General 
Data. Absolutely excellent. 


I suggest making a table with each printer or labeler in the columns and then a 
list on the left of the key features you want, or they have. Then compare each 
one. Prioritize your most desired features (including price!). Have the key 
people score each one. 


Tim Morken
Supervisor, Electron Microscopy/Neuromuscular Special Studies
Department of Pathology
UC San Francisco Medical Center

-----Original Message-----
From: Whitaker, Bonnie via Histonet <histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu> 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 1:38 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] slide printer

Hi All,

I am posting this for a friend.  Any info would be appreciated.

Any way we are looking at several slide printer options and wondered the 
following:

1)      What are you using?

2)      Did you first try any other vendors besides the one you are using now?

3)      Do you like what you are using now?

4)      Is it a one or two slide hopper - ie can you load and then select 
charged or non-charged slides?

5)      Are you using vendor specific recommended slides or have you 
substituted for a cheaper or other option?

6)      We are looking specifically at Leica, SlideMate and ESPO - do you have 
any experience of info from other users you know about these vendors?

Any and all information you are able to share would be appreciated.


Thanks,
Bonnie

Bonnie Whitaker
AP Operations Director
The Ohio State University
Department of Pathology

614-293-8418


_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.utsouthwestern.edu_mailman_listinfo_histonet&d=DwICAg&c=iORugZls2LlYyCAZRB3XLg&r=7cy9qXFa73jDX2Iixpjkq1XlWAfHgLLHm33agI_sCKA&m=18g-wVk5i-6n_slwSEACqnjBrPxPAtiene9uRo6tlvQ&s=i_n4itaiddJ5GNyevVc-M6XUUvNI9Ij34j3A0rYrjpA&e=
 

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

Reply via email to