On 6/10/15 9:17 AM, Richard Welty wrote: > i've set up a page in the wiki for a relation type proposal > to go alongside Rob's entrenchment tags, ohm:military > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Military > > i expect to flesh out some subtypes, as i'm working out a scheme > to describe troop movements during campaigns and battles. > comments are welcome. > and commenting on my own message - big question is a single military relation with extensive subtypes, or a bunch of distinct relations. since i'm interested in describing movements, it would be
type=ohm:movement vs type=ohm:military ohm:military=movement but do these really have enough in common for a single type to be appropriate? i'm thinking no, not really. FYI, movement would consist of an ordered list of ways and nodes with dates attached, and some sort of description of what was moving (regiment, division, supplies, ...) the eventual goal is to be able to support animations of several kinds. richard -- [email protected] Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Historic mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
