[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12864522#action_12864522
]
John Sichi commented on HIVE-1293:
----------------------------------
@Namit: do we actually have to explicitly X-lock all partitions when we X-lock
a table? Doesn't the fact that we always S-lock the table before locking
specific partitions already serve as a form of intent lock (we can't get the
table X-lock if anyone already has a table S-lock, and we can't get a table
S-lock if someone already has the table X-lock)?
> Concurreny Model for Hive
> -------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-1293
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1293
> Project: Hadoop Hive
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Query Processor
> Reporter: Namit Jain
> Assignee: Namit Jain
>
> Concurrency model for Hive:
> Currently, hive does not provide a good concurrency model. The only
> guanrantee provided in case of concurrent readers and writers is that
> reader will not see partial data from the old version (before the write) and
> partial data from the new version (after the write).
> This has come across as a big problem, specially for background processes
> performing maintenance operations.
> The following possible solutions come to mind.
> 1. Locks: Acquire read/write locks - they can be acquired at the beginning of
> the query or the write locks can be delayed till move
> task (when the directory is actually moved). Care needs to be taken for
> deadlocks.
> 2. Versioning: The writer can create a new version if the current version is
> being read. Note that, it is not equivalent to snapshots,
> the old version can only be accessed by the current readers, and will be
> deleted when all of them have finished.
> Comments.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
