oh. Since it is a TLP, we can have sub-projects instead of contrib. Great!
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 7:54 PM, yongqiang he <heyongqiang...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1. > > Another benefit is that after Hive becomes a TLP, we can hold more and > bigger contrib projects. > > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher <ham...@cloudera.com> > wrote: >> Yes, I think Hive is ready to become a TLP. >> >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Ashish Thusoo <athu...@facebook.com> wrote: >> >>> Nice one Ed... >>> >>> Folks, >>> >>> Please chime in. I think we should close this out next week one way or the >>> other. We can consider this a vote at this point, so please vote on this >>> issue. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ashish >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Edward Capriolo [mailto:edlinuxg...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 8:05 AM >>> To: hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Move to become a TLP >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Ashish Thusoo <athu...@facebook.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Folks, >>> > >>> > This question has come up in the PMC once again and would be great to >>> hear once more on this topic. What do people think? Are we ready to become a >>> TLP? >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Ashish >>> >>> I thought of one more benefit. We can rename our packages from >>> >>> org.apache.hadoop.hive.* >>> to >>> org.apache.hive.* >>> >>> :) >>> >> >
