The two interfaces are likely to migrate in different directions. Registry is the "outward facing view" (which perhaps should have getConfiguration() ... RegistryInfrastructure is the internal view. I expect that RI will change if and when we start adding a concept of visibility to services and configurations ... in which case, the RI methods will take a Module parameter identifying the "requesting" Module (so that the containing Module can decide whether the service/configuration should be exposed).
-- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind http://howardlewisship.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 4:33 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Interfaces Registry and RegistryInfrastructure > > > > I am just asking whether the changes concerning these > interfaces in alpha 5 > are correct: > > - Registry has lost the getConfiguration(..) method > - Both Registry and RegistryInfrastructur have the same getService(..) > method > > From my point of view (it is very low) the Registry should have: > - getService(..) > - getConfiguration(..) > > And RegistryInfrastructure should not have: > - getService(..) > > Tsch��, > Stefan > > compeople AG > Untermainanlage 8 > 60329 Frankfurt > > fon: +49 (69) 272218 - 0 > fax: +49 (69) 272218 - 22 > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > home: www.compeople.de > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
