I understand that. But, what if users DO use it? What happens when we release 1.1 with these features in there that eliminate the processModule() methods in RegistryBuilder and replace them with another method like addModuleDescriptor()? I guess one solution would be to "cripple" RegistryBuilder by ONLY allowing constructDefaultRegistry(). Then, in 1.1, we would allow it to be more robust. Another solution would be to deprecate the other stuff in the 1.0 release telling users that there will be a different mechanism for customizing the registry in 1.1 (use at your own discretion). Maybe the deprecation would be better, since there are actually users out there already using it.
-----Original Message----- From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 9:30 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [RESULT] Release HiveMind 1.0-rc-2 I'm not sure how the internal restructuring will affect users, even if it widely affects HiveMind? Typical users will use HiveMindFilter or RegistryBuilder.getDefaultRegistry() and those will likely not change. The extra options will only be visible to advanced users. I really don't want to hold up 1.0! On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 09:06:47 -0400, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are we going to address these new ideas before 1.0 release? If we really do > re-structure the RegistryBuilder, that's quite a dramatic change to the core > of HiveMind and should probably be done before an official release of 1.0. > I think it's a nice clean-up/refactoring and will make things more > understandable or intuitive (and easier to describe in an article). > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 9:03 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [RESULT] Release HiveMind 1.0-rc-2 > > Howard Lewis Ship: +1 (binding) > Harish Krishnaswamy: +1 (binding) > Knut Wannheden: +1 (binding) > Erik Hatcher: +1 (binding) > James Carman: +1 (no response) > > I'll get started on the label and the release! > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 10:52:03 -0400 > Subject: [VOTE] Release HiveMind 1.0-rc-2 > To: [email protected] > > The system works ... we've found and fixed a few bugs in rc-1. > > Here's the fixes: > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVEMIND-44 > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVEMIND-47 > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVEMIND-48 > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVEMIND-49 > > I'm pretty sure we've nailed the mutithreading and class loading bugs > at this point. It's now time to get exposure on those fixes in the > form of rc-2. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
