|
What if the service interface’s method returns something?� How can it be asynchronous?� I agree that the Executor interface could be used as a service itself, but to use that idea as a service model doesn’t work IMHO.� My suggestion would be to expose the Executor (or actually ExecutorService in JDK 5.0) interface as a service in your registry (as you’ve already done it seems) and let other services use it.� A service model itself cannot be asynchronous, as it is a mechanism for performing a method call (which is inherently synchronous) on an object.� Even when you call the Executor.execute() method, it’s a synchronous call.� The method does what it’s supposed to do (adds the Runnable to a queue or something) and returns.�
-----Original Message-----
El lun, 25-10-2004 a las 09:25, James Carman escribi�: The service models need to be synchronous,
|
- Pooled Service Model enhancements Jean-Francois Poilpret
- Re: Pooled Service Model enhancements Bob Arnott
- Re: Pooled Service Model enhancements Marcus Brito
- RE: Pooled Service Model enhancements James Carman
- RE: Pooled Service Model enhancements Pablo Lalloni
- RE: Pooled Service Model enhanceme... James Carman
- RE: Pooled Service Model enha... Pablo Lalloni
- RE: Pooled Service Model ... James Carman
- RE: Pooled Service Mo... Jean-Francois Poilpret
- Re: Pooled Service Mo... Howard Lewis Ship
