On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 08:35:50 -0500, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Has anyone else come up with a way to do this cleanly? I think one big step > in the right direction would be support for overriding the interceptor's > name, replacing the factory's id with something else. This way, we could > define ONE service interceptor factory which inserts a MethodInterceptor > defined elsewhere in the registry (or inline maybe) and the interceptors > could still be ordered, since they could have unique names. We could leave > it backward compatible, of course, defaulting the interceptor name to the > service id of the interceptor factory. >
+1. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
