[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVEMIND-121?page=comments#action_64846 ] Knut Wannheden commented on HIVEMIND-121: -----------------------------------------
I'm wondering if the lightweight initialization should instead be using a different (mutually exclusive) attribute than "class". Maybe "spec" or something. Or alternatively a separate attribute just for this initialization data: params="verbose,timeout=5000". Some things to think about: - How should conflicts be handled? E.g. a nested <set> conflicting with the lightweight initializer. - Should the lightweight initializer support object providers? E.g. "foo=service:foo";? - Should these ideas also be extended to <create-instance>? > BuilderFactory should support lightweight initialization > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HIVEMIND-121 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVEMIND-121 > Project: HiveMind > Type: Improvement > Components: framework > Versions: 1.1 > Reporter: Howard M. Lewis Ship > Fix For: 1.1 > > It would be nice if the hivmind.BuilderFactory supported light-weight > initialization, i.e. > <invoke-factory> > <construct class="com.example.MyServiceImpl,verbose,timeout=5000"> ... > </construct> > </invoke-factory> > Properties could be set after the service implementation is instantiated and > properties wired (and autowired) normally. > Less XML is good. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
