Did you make sure you called addElement() at the end of your schema rules?
-----Original Message----- From: David J. M. Karlsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 7:18 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: interceptor: getting name of implemened interface Knut Wannheden wrote: > David, > > Yes all method calls will go through the interceptor you add. It is > thus up to the interceptor to decide whether it should actually do > something or just pass on to the delegate. For the interceptor to know > what to do the interceptor factory must pass the parameters (in your > case <include> and <exclude>) on (e.g. through the interceptor > constructor). > > If you like you can also take a look at HiveMind's logging interceptor > LoggingInterceptorFactory. It uses Javassist to create an interceptor > class and an instance thereof on the fly. The <include> and <exclude> > method matching logic is encapsulated directly by this generated > class. You may of course also prefer the dynamic proxy approach and > code a generic interceptor class yourself. YMMV. I took a look at the class - but I'm a little confused over this: In the LoggingInterceptorFactory you get a List of parameters (the include/exclude patterns), and the elements in the list are cast to MethodContribution objects. In my interceptorfactory I receive a List of parameters containing org.apache.hivemind.impl.ElementImpl objects. Howcome? -- David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43 http://www.davidkarlsen.com http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
