Hi,

We are trying to use hivemind-jmx in our application running under JBoss 
3.2.7.  The "hivemind.management.MBeans" contribution is ok, but we've found 
problems (conflicts) with PerformanceMonitor and LogManagement:

- javax.management.MBeanFeatureInfo's JBoss implementation (superclass of 
javax.management.MBeanParameterInfo y javax.management.MBeanAttributeInfo), 
validates in his constructor that "name" (first constructor's parameter) must 
be a valid java identifier (ex: "blah" is valid but "blah blah" is not).

- PerformanceMonitor expose dynamic MBeans, and it has in its attribute's 
names the method signature that it is collecting info ( ex someMethod( some 
parameter ) ); then, when the interceptor tries to register the dynamic MBean 
gets a runtime exception:

java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: name is not a valid java type (or is a 
reserved word): blah blah
        at javax.management.MBeanFeatureInfo.<init>(MBeanFeatureInfo.java:68)
        at 
javax.management.MBeanAttributeInfo.<init>(MBeanAttributeInfo.java:99)
        at 
gov.afip.pampa.component.AttributeInfoTest.main(AttributeInfoTest.java:20)

our solution was modify the interceptor 
(org.apache.hivemind.management.impl.PerformanceMonitorFactory), to use names 
that are valid java identifiers.

-  Also, LogManagement uses for dynamic MBeans 
org.apache.log4j.jmx.LoggerDynamicMBean, and this class creates 
javax.management.MBeanParameterInfo with invalid (for JBoss) names:

    // the <SPACE> in "class name" is wrong
    params[0] = new MBeanParameterInfo("class name", "java.lang.String",
                                       "add an appender to this logger"); 
    // idem
    params[1] = new MBeanParameterInfo("appender name", "java.lang.String",
                                       "name of the appender");

again, our solution was implement this class and modify the ParameterInfo's 
name.

Anyone has already found this problems with JBoss and hivemind-jmx?  How was 
solved?

I think it would be important for hivemind-jmx to be capable of running under 
JBoss out-of-the-box considering it is the open source application server 
with greatest market share and developer adoption.

Thanks!

-- 
Sebastian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to