I made a patch for this some times ago. Seems to be the right
time to integrate ist.
Achim
Am Thu, 21 Jul 2005 03:17:46 +0200 (CEST) schrieb wu zhi hui (JIRA)
<hivemind-dev@jakarta.apache.org>:
the service configuration may be return a real ojbect instead of list ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HIVEMIND-139
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVEMIND-139
Project: HiveMind
Type: Improvement
Components: framework
Versions: 1.1
Environment: hivemind-1.1-beta-2
Reporter: wu zhi hui
I am a developer (or team leader may be ) of a j2ee company of china ,
we use apache avolon framework as our java container
framework in the past years, now we want to change to hivemind, I'm
trying your hivemind-1.1-beta-2, I think it's better than spring and
it's soul coming from avolon, the greate framework I appreciated . here
I have some idea (may be it's wrong) about the hivemind's service
configuration, I found that I define a configuration schema that return
only one java object , but the contribution always return a List
contains that java object, so I have to define the service method to
"public void setConfig(Collection config) " instead of "public void
setMyObject(MyObject ojb)" , this cause my service look like ugly and
confusing , may be you think that in most time the service
configuration is complex so return a list may be the best choise, but I
think a simple java ojbect as a configuration may be simple and
commonly to be used becouse define a complex java oject using "rules"
is much more defficult than using "conversion".
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
