Chris, On 9/26/05, Chris Burnley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think option 2 (adding default attribute to "attribute" element) is > better, because of the reason you mentioned and you could effectively kill > 2 birds by not needing to implement HIVEMIND-150 ( which I raised recently > ). >
I see what you mean. You would define an <attribute> with a default value and a <read-attribute> rule instead of using the <set-property> rule. This would of course work, but unless you want a contribution to be able to override the default value of this property I think it would be the wrong solution. So in summary I still think that HIVEMIND-150 is valid. --knut --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
