-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi James,
When you say internal, what do you mean exactly? Johan James Carman wrote: > Johan, > > I seem to remember this conversation now. With the refactoring that I'm > proposing (getting injection for free) in HiveMind 2.0, the "init method" > would become part of the "assembly instructions." I don't know about the > shutdown method, though. Maybe we could make the RegistryShutdownListener > something that's internal. > > James > > -----Original Message----- > From: Johan Lindquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:38 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: 1.1.2 Release... > > Hi, > > Yes, deprecation would of course be the way to go - a little to hasty in > my wording. > > In any case, I think you and I discussed this earlier - just like the > initializeService method is the default name of the method to call when > starting a service, the registryDidShutdown method would work in similar > fashion. > > I do know that currently, the registry shutdown is tied to the service > model and that the initializeService is tied to the builder factory. > > The problem I guess is how to propagate which method is to be used when > the registry shuts down. This could be added to the builder factory, > but not sure if that is the correct approach. > > As for the other, no worries - think I am looking for those feature for > use within my project and therefore the strive to get them in ;) > > Cheers, > > Johan > > James Carman wrote: >>> Johan, >>> >>> What do you propose instead of the RegistryShutdownListener? We can't > just >>> remove it. We would have to deprecate it for some time before we just > pull >>> the rug out from under our users. >>> >>> As for the other requests, they are enhancement requests (I know, my >>> parameterIndex was an enhancement, but needed by Tapestry). I am looking >>> for more bug-releated requests. We should definitely look into the >>> enhancements you mention for 1.2 (and of course 2.0). >>> >>> James >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Johan Lindquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 2:30 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: 1.1.2 Release... >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have mentioned it before - and it's probably turning into a rant for you >>> all ;) - but I'd like to see conditional sub-modules, ordering of eager >>> loaded services and possibly even removal of the RegistryShutdownListener >>> interface in the next version. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Johan >>> >>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> Is there anything that you folks think we should additionally include in > a >>>> 1.1.2 release? I have added something today (StrategyFactory now allows >>>> you >>>> to specify which parameter is used to pick a strategy). >>>> >>>> James >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > > -- > you too? - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- you too? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEkVmk1Tv8wj7aQ34RApzMAJ44J+Vlgm+DS2glqqUQFB3qL0sQLQCcDNBQ y5VrC4qEQnmupZVco7jAprM= =r2VI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
