Hivemind
users,
Are there any hard
number comparisons of bytecode engineer versus dynamic proxy? The reason I ask
is that I've written a Hivemind factory that bytecode engineers a proxy for an
interface as a proof of concept and am comparing it to a dynamic proxy version
based on an invocation framework that I previously developed and I wanted to get
confirmation on the numbers I'm seeing.
For 10000 method
invocations (the method logic performs a lot of business functions - its not
just stub code):
| Run | Bytecode Engineered | Dynamic Proxy | Percentage |
| 1 | 1415 | 1596 | 88.66% |
| 2 | 743 | 853 | 87.10% |
| 3 | 753 | 844 | 89.22% |
Which is roughly a
11% performance difference (on IBM JDK 1.4.1/Windows XP).
I had hoped for a
more compelling difference to make the case for moving beyond a proof of concept
a bit stronger.
Thanks.
Naresh Sikha
Senior
Staff, Technology Solutions
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
211 Main Street
SF211MN-07-347
San Francisco, CA 94105-1918
W:
415-667-1286
F: 415-667-9397
E:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WARNING:
All email sent to this address will be received by the Charles Schwab & Co.,
Inc. corporate email system and is subject to archival and review by someone
other than the recipient.
