Here it is ... 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg37135.html

You might also want to take a look at Chris Nokleberg's comment.

-Harish

On 5/23/05, belaran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you do find those informations , i'll be very interested too...
> 
> 2005/5/23, Harish Krishnaswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Have you looked in the mail archives? I posted a performance
> > comparison between the three a while back; I guess during the days
> > when HiveMind was in Commons.
> >
> > -Harish
> >
> > On 5/23/05, Michael Mattox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > I'm interested in using HiveMind for dependency injection and I'm very
> > > interested in using the interceptors.  I've been researching the
> > > performance aspects and so far what I've seen has been pretty vague.  I've
> > > read that with JDK 1.5 the JDK dynamic proxy performance is about 1.5
> > > times slower.  That's a big hit for my application if I'm using these
> > > interceptors for all calls to all my services.  I then read that CGLIB has
> > > a drop-in replacement for the JDK dynamic proxies but I cannot find any
> > > performance measurements, especially for JDK 1.5.  Finally I read in the
> > > HiveMind documentation that JavAssist gives a "slight" perf advantage but
> > > in several instances it was stated that it greatly increases the
> > > development complexity.  I'm curious what the performance increase is
> > > exactly.  If Javassist is only 1.4 times slower, then I think it's not
> > > worth it.  1.1 times and it may be worth it.  I'm hoping to get some
> > > feedback on this because creating a little prototype will take some time
> > > although I'm starting to think it may be worth it.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This E-mail is confidential.  It may also be legally privileged.  If you 
> > > are
> > > not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of 
> > > it.
> > > If you have received this message in error, please delete it and all 
> > > copies
> > > from your system and notify the sender immediately by return E-mail.
> > > Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error 
> > > or
> > > virus-free.  The sender does not accept liability for any errors or 
> > > omissions.
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to