No, the beta should be fine for this.  Can you show us the code you use to
ask the registry for the Counter service and then subsequently call methods
on it?  Show us the code you use to do it multiple times?



-----Original Message-----
From: Aleksej [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 2:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: confuze with service model

James Carman wrote:

>What version of HM are you using?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Aleksej [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 8:46 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: confuze with service model
>
>Having such simple service description as:
>-----
>    <service-point id="Counter" interface="mediena.services.Counter">
>        <create-instance class="impl.CounterImpl" model="singleton"/>
>    </service-point>
>-----
>
>where Counter interface looks like this:
>-----
>    int getCounter();
>    void increaseCounter( int value );
>-----
>
>and CounterImpl keeps counter value and logs each method I found that 
>every time
>I ask registry for Counter service and call any method, registry creates 
>new instance of
>Service. I call them from the same thread and even from the same 
>method... By default service
>is sigleton, but even not defining model at all behaviour is still the
same.
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>  
>
I am using 1.1beta2. Do I need to use 1.0? How stable beta2 is?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to