Ok, thats different from what I thought. Its more like this: if 2 different threads access a singleton service and this singleton service uses a threaded service. Then the theads calling the singleton both have access to a different instance of the threaded service.
Regards, Diego On 8/17/05, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Correct. The singleton service's implementation will receive a proxy > (implementing the service interface of the threaded service) which delegates > to a thread-local implementation object instance. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hensley, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:57 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Injecting a threaded service into a singleton service > > If I understand your question correctly, the following will occur: > > There will on be one instance of the singleton service. > > There will be an instance per thread for the threaded service. > > Richard > > -----Original Message----- > From: Diego [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 8:41 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Injecting a threaded service into a singleton service > > Hello, > > Is this correct: If I injecting a threaded service into a singleton > service there will be only 1 service instance create for the threaded > service? > > Regards, > Diego > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
