*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
{ Sila lawat Laman Hizbi-Net - http://www.hizbi.net }
{ Hantarkan mesej anda ke: [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
{ Iklan barangan? Hantarkan ke [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
PAS : KE ARAH PEMERINTAHAN ISLAM YANG ADIL
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Assalamualaikum,
Untuk bahan bacaan.
Haris petik daripada diskusi COMPUTERGUYS.
COMPUTERGUYS-L Digest - 20 Mar 2001 to 21 Mar 2001 - Special issue
(#2001-118)
Wassalam.
: )
--
Subject:
FWD: NSF study: "Internet Voting is no 'Magic Ballot'": [risks] Risks
Digest 21.28
Date:
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:20:25 -0500
From:
David Chessler <chessler@>
* Original: FROM..... Dave Farber
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:24:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Terry Carroll
Subject: NSF study: "Internet Voting is no 'Magic Ballot'"
RISKS has previously had discussions of the risks associated with going
to
computerized voting (especially Internet-based voting) as an attempted
panacea for the types of problems we saw in the last US presidential
election.
The National Science Foundation recently released a study that it
commissioned from the Internet Policy Institute on problems associated
with
Internet voting. The NSF's press release on the study may be found at
<http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/news/press/01/pr0118.htm>. The IPI has a
page
devoted to the study (including a link to the report itself) at
<http://www.internetpolicy.org/research/results.html>.
The NSF highlights the following findings with respect to the
feasibility
of Internet voting:
- Poll site Internet voting systems offer some benefits and could be
responsibly deployed within the next several election cycles;
- The next step beyond poll-site voting would be to deploy kiosk voting
terminals in non-traditional public voting sites;
- Remote Internet voting systems pose significant risk and should not be
used in public elections until substantial technical and social science
issues are addressed; and
- Internet-based voter registration poses significant risk to the
integrity
of the voting process, and should not be implemented for the foreseeable
future.
Terry Carroll, Santa Clara, CA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[These results are rather similar to the findings of the California
commission. Interested readers should also dig up the recent
Caltech/MIT
report, which states that lever machines, hand-counted paper ballots,
and
optically scanned ballots are all significantly more accurate than
direct-recording voting machines (DREs) and Internet voting schemes.
PGN]
For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/
--
-
http://hafnie.terrashare.com/
Bantuan Komputer Internet Melalui Email
Email kosong kepada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
( Melanggan ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] pada body : SUBSCRIBE HIZB)
( Berhenti ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] pada body: UNSUBSCRIBE HIZB)
( Segala pendapat yang dikemukakan tidak menggambarkan )
( pandangan rasmi & bukan tanggungjawab HIZBI-Net )
( Bermasalah? Sila hubungi [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pengirim: "Harisfazillah Jamel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
