Checkout this link: http://gs1.ender.us/cs_without_media_player.jpg

You can see it does make a difference for non-source servers too.

Still, I am curious about "hlbooster for cs"; where do I find it?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [xXx] con
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 07:36
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] FPS?

the media player trick only works with cs source. you need hlbooster for
cs
1.6
its a metamod plugin and it works well.
my 32 man cs 1.6 averages 185 full, but it does use some considerable
cpu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Visitor Rodgers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 8:29 PM
Subject: [hlds] FPS?


> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I was curious to see
> the difference between two servers.  So I loaded the server on both
> and fired up both.  I used the standard technique of running media
> player to hook the mm timer and set the process priority to HIGH on
> both.  Well, the existing server is running on at 1.3ghz the other
> server is running a dual-core 3ghz.  Both servers report FPS at around

> 85 on the Statistics Tab.
>
> Am I missing something in my understanding?  I thougth for sure the
> faster server would have a much higher frame rate.  I have read people

> post here with frame rates of 500 or higher...HOW?
>
> --
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to