--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
set your client sv_maxupdaterate to 100.
I don't know if this will effect the interp, but it will show right as
cl_interp 0.01 then :)

2007/9/21, AnAkIn . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> I also noticed something odd.
>
> cl_updaterate 100
> cl_interp_ratio 1
>
> and cl_interp doesn't go to 0.01 like it should...is that just a bug with
> cl_interp, or the interpolation is affected too? It seems that
> cl_updaterate
> 100 doesn't work with cl_interp_ratio. But if you lower cl_updaterate to
> like 80 or less, cl_interp is changing.
>
> 2007/9/21, Sean Rowswell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > This is a multipart message in MIME format.
> > --
> > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> > ] cl_interp
> >
> > "cl_interp" = "0.033" ( def. "0.1" )
> >
> > - temp var for backwards compatibility during beta
> >
> >
> >
> > ] cl_interp_ratio
> >
> > "cl_interp_ratio" = "2" ( def. "2.0" )
> >
> > client
> >
> > - Sets the interpolation amount (final amount is cl_interp_ratio /
> > cl_updaterate).
> >
> >
> >
> > ] alias cl_interp lol
> >
> > ] cl_interp_ratio 1
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > Unknown command "lol"
> >
> > <after 2 seconds>
> >
> > ] cl_interp_ratio 2
> >
> > <console spam stops>
> >
> >
> >
> > Is this an exploit that could be used to bypass
> cl_interp/cl_interp_ratio
> > rate restrictions? If not, then why does it continuously try to change
> > cl_interp after cl_interp_ratio is changed?
> >
> > Also I thought cl_interp was a temporary variable for the BETA (read the
> > cvar description pasted above); isn't the BETA for it over now?
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > - Sean
> >
> >
> >
> > UPDATE:
> >
> > ] find cl_interp
> >
> > "cl_interp" = "0.033" ( def. "0.1" )
> >
> > - temp var for backwards compatibility during beta
> >
> > ] cl_interp 0.01
> >
> > <event player_setting>  <--- changing it to 0.01
> >
> > <event player_setting>  <--- changing it back to 0.033
> >
> > ] cl_interp
> >
> > "cl_interp" = "0.033" ( def. "0.1" )
> >
> > - temp var for backwards compatibility during beta
> >
> > ] cl_interp 0.01; alias cl_interp !lol
> >
> > <event player_setting>   <--- changing it to 0.01
> >
> > <event player_command: "Unknown command: !lol">   <--- cant change it
> back
> > to 0.033 because its aliased
> >
> > Unknown command: !lol
> >
> > Unknown command: !lol
> >
> > Unknown command: !lol
> >
> > Unknown command: !lol
> >
> > Unknown command: !lol
> >
> > ] find cl_interp
> >
> > "cl_interp" = "0.01" ( def. "0.1" )
> >
> > - temp var for backwards compatibility during beta
> >
> >
> >
> > So yes this does look to be an exploit to bypass cl_interp_ratio as well
> > as
> > any cl_interp_ratio server enforcement. Comments?
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> --
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
--

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to