I think they're likely more worried about a malicious plugin than a license.


On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Gavin Langdon <puttabu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's actually against the license to distribute smx files without also
> distributing source code.
>
> sent from mobile
> On Apr 7, 2013 4:21 PM, "Harsh Baid" <harshbai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Just finished talking with him. Apparently he privately contacts
>> communities and doesn't want to become another "pinion" according to him.
>> Also he won't let anyone see the source code to his .smx plugin and with
>> that i flat out denied and said no, i don't want to participate.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> please visit:
>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to