That sounds weird... :P Should we ask ourself what redhat (or any other dist) is first of all. It's no a company/group who writes there own program and sell it... No, instead they take programs which they think would fit in there product and sell it togheter with other programs, pre configured so they will work pretty much out of the box.
So if 90% of all linux users out there uses redhat and someone suddenly reports a bug in ssh or apache. Then ofcourse statistics would say that 90% of the bugs under linux are in redhat distributions. But ops, there wasn't a bug in redhat itself, it was in the program ssh or apache the bug existed... Therefor can you not say that some dist is more secure than someone else. Because they are all made of the same kernel, and if you choose to run all the stupid services as default then you are the worst security whole ever :P /Oscar MKiller wrote: >>Most hacked servers are redhat for the simple reason, theres more redhat >>servers than any other distro flavour. >> >> > >Some statistics say that 90% of bugs under linux are in red hat distributions xD > > >_______________________________________________ >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
