heh. so I assume you get it up that high by jacking up the HZ even higher? what do you guys think about that network buffer setting mentioned here? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-kerne l-limits.html
kev -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Simon Garner Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Linux, FreeBSD, Windows 2000, Latency test From: "Justin Head" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > You can make it run even faster... I'll let you guys figure it out... > > 520 fps -- host( 2) sv( 0) cl( 0) gfx( 0) snd( 0) ents(147) > 482 fps -- host( 2) sv( 0) cl( 0) gfx( 0) snd( 0) ents(147) > 496 fps -- host( 2) sv( 0) cl( 0) gfx( 0) snd( 0) ents(147) > 495 fps -- host( 2) sv( 0) cl( 0) gfx( 0) snd( 0) ents(147) > 525 fps -- host( 2) sv( 0) cl( 0) gfx( 0) snd( 0) ents(147) > 521 fps -- host( 2) sv( 0) cl( 0) gfx( 0) snd( 0) ents(147) > > And faster still... =) > Question is, is it really running faster or is increasing the system clock rate just fooling HLDS's fps counter. -Simon _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
