Well ym dual AMD 1400+ does More Work than my Dual 2.4ghz Xeon machine with my current red hat insatll, and it lags worse when it does, Because each of the servers spike up to 70 % cpus usage randomly
I love AMD chips and will probably be buying ONly amd servers from now on ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Albuschat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:33 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Eric (Deacon) wrote: > > > > > I have Intel Nic , redhat 7.2, kernel 2.4.19 and the same problems > > > > of perf : lags and high cpu usage. > > > > > > /me too :-) > > > > > > SuSE 7.3, 2.4.10-4GB, latest hlds. > > > > > > Very high CPU load when more than 3-4 players are connected... > > > Running on a Pentium IV 1.8 Ghz machine with 1.024 MB RAM > > > > I think I heard AMD calling your name :P > > I really think that a 1.8 Ghz CPU (no matter, if AMD or Intel) > shouldn't get that high load when running the halflife server > with 4 players. > > And, to begin a flamewar, as it was your wish, I think that > Intel CPU's and Intel chipsets are much more reliable than > AMD one's. > And in my opinion reliability is more important than performance, > especially when talking of server machines. > > What is a broken CPU good for? :P > > As I said, 1.8Ghz should be enough for this task. > Just imagine, Half-Life is now a plenty years old. > Back then, there were no 1.8Ghz machines but gameserver > ran anyway. :-) > > cu, Daniel > > -- > eat(this); // delicious suicide > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
