This is all I was trying to argue last night, but James and Daniel aren't even open to the possibility that the numbers are even remotely innacurate
Yes, I know, I'm sorry, names often get mixed up my head as do the words I'm trying to get out, very frustrating :-/
you mean james and brian. I was the first to dispute the numbers and mention security issues with going back to such an old kernel.
Yes very sorry, your completely right. I apologize.
I just disagree in an agreeable manner. With testing and my opinions. Im not trying to insult anyone or get into an argument. My boxes all normally run 2.6.0-test kernels at 1000hz. Cpu usage is high. I think this is valve issue mostly, but it can't hurt to test and share results between us to find something that works as good as possible with the current usage issues.
I totally agree. I didn't take issue with him testing or retesting, all I didn't agree with was that retesting a bogus value would produce verifyable results.
-sb
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
