You need at least Debian Sarge, and module-init-tools, then it should work smootly.
- Sindre >===== Original Message From "knightazul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ===== >The kernell 2.60 for debian >I have all time kernell panic >help me > >Atentamente, > >H0StMaN_ReMhost >| ReMhost | - Servicios de Internet >http://www.remhost.net > >MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >IRC Hispano #remhost.net /Q @H0StMaN_ReMhost >IRC Quakenet #remhost.net /Q @H0StMaN_ReMhost > >Email General: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Email Altas: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Email Tecnico: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Email Comercial: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Scott Pettit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 8:39 PM >Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] loss + choke - help! > > >> 20 servers with 16 out of 20 players online, and especially with the >state >> of the Intel binaries on 2x 2.4GHz CPUs... >> >> /me smells bullshit >> >> Cheers, >> >> Scott >> ___________________ >> Scott Pettit >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> ICQ: #79087100 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nelson >Marques >> Sent: Sunday, 30 November 2003 8:07 a.m. >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] loss + choke - help! >> >> between 16/20 slots per server >> with average 150 users load. >> >> nelson >> >> Shane Robinett aka Weaver wrote: >> >> >I can run 100 servers. >> > >> >The question is: How many active filled slots can you do? And how big are >> >the servers that are filled? >> > >> > >> >----- Original Message ----- >> >From: "Patel, Monil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 1:12 PM >> >Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] loss + choke - help! >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >>How do i go about disabling hyper threading? >> >> >> >>On top of that, >> >>I have just identified that we're losing packets from the gateway to the >> >>server >> >> >> >>but I still want to disbalbe hyper threading if it makes them perform >> >>better! >> >> >> >>Monil >> >>----- Original Message ----- >> >>From: "Nelson Marques" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 6:01 PM >> >>Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] loss + choke - help! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>I do agree with you, but some 'power mongers' here just said I was >wrong >> >>>a couple of days ago. >> >>>Welcome to the 'wise ones' club :) >> >>> >> >>>Nelson >> >>> >> >>>Steven Hartland wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>>I would try disabling hyperthreading we found it caused lag in >> >>>>most cases. >> >>>> Steve / K >> >>>>----- Original Message ----- >> >>>>From: "Patel, Monil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>>Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 4:04 PM >> >>>>Subject: [hlds_linux] loss + choke - help! >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>This is a multi-part message in MIME format. >> >>>>-- >> >>>>[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] >> >>>>Hey, >> >>>> >> >>>>I'm running six cstrike processes on my dual xeons (2.4ghz 2gb ddr) & >3 >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>on my p4's (2.4ghz 1gb ddr). it is connected through a >> >> >> >> >> >>>>10/100 switchport, people are complaining of loss (0-10 but 10-20 when >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>busy). i am using default redhat 8.0 kernel, >> >> >> >> >> >>>>top shows: >> >>>>CPU0 states: 58.3% user, 1.4% system, 0.0% nice, 39.1% idle >> >>>>CPU1 states: 51.1% user, 2.1% system, 0.0% nice, 46.1% idle >> >>>>CPU2 states: 48.1% user, 2.3% system, 0.0% nice, 48.4% idle >> >>>>CPU3 states: 49.0% user, 1.0% system, 0.0% nice, 48.0% idle >> >>>> >> >>>>any ideas? >> >>>> >> >>>>monil >> >>>>-- >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>_______________________________________________ >> >>>>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>please visit: >> >> >> >> >> >>>>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>_______________________________________________ >> >>>>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>please visit: >> >> >> >> >> >>>>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>_______________________________________________ >> >>>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> >>> >> >>> >> >>please visit: >> >> >> >> >> >>>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >> >>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> >> >> >> >> >please visit: >> > >> > >> >>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > >_______________________________________________ >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
