--- Daniel Stroven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Really? wow...no kidding. lol duh. No one said it was a cheat. I > never > addressed the sv_download url bug.
Daniel, please reread his original post. He cites "security issues likes sv_download bug or stuff like that?" He doesn't even mention cheats, but you reply with a comment about cheats (which was grossly inaccurate). That's right, you don't address the issue of sv_download, instead, you totally change the topic of discussion. I was trying to clarify that he wasn't asking about cheats, he wants to know about security vulnerabilities. why you replied talking about cheats is unknown. maybe a conversation with your self in your head, I don't know. Regardless, Quit acting like a jackass. > > b) there were plenty of cheats pre-retail (beta 7.x). > beta 7.x was officially valves, and realistically there were not > cheats. Realistically, there were cheats. > People will still accusing of "headshot" scripts that didnt > exist..and xyz > either had not come out yet or just came out right around that time. Like Eric said, Spiked Models. I know Lambert was around in 7.x if not 6.x. > > c) Valve "took over" with the beta 5 patch, IIRC. > > > Go back and double check. Valve did not take over until 7.x series > if my > memory is correct, when they changed the models to 512 and removed > the > twitch and death animations. I started running my servers in beta > 5.2 and > Valve did not yet own counter-strike yet. IIRC = if I remember correctly. I wasn't stating fact, trying to recall as best I could. Obviously people have corrected this. I think Eric was more accurate with the 6.x patch that contained the netcode. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 1:44 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CS BETA 5.2 Server > > > > > > --- Daniel Stroven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Those issues were not a problem. Cheats didn't even exist in CS > > > until Valve > > > took over and released retail version. 6.x series has less bugs > and > > > more > > > game play balance between weapons. 5.2 was when cs really > started > > > coming > > > together, but of the beta's 6.x series was the best overall. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "ruwen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 10:10 AM > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CS BETA 5.2 Server > > > > > > > > > > Daniel Stroven wrote: > > > > > > > > >5.2 was a fun version but has some issues. If you want to > play > > > beta that > > > > >was the most polished, I suggest beta 6.1 or 6.5. > > > > > > > > security issues likes sv_download bug or stuff like that? > > > > i dont care about gameplay issues. > > > > > > > > greetings ruwen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > > archives, > > > please visit: > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > > archives, please visit: > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
