It still crashes with updated linux enviroment under FreeBSD.
glibc is now 2.3.5.
/Bjorn
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, kama wrote:
>
> Ok, managed to get fedora 4 installed on FBSD 5.3... Lets see tomorrow if
> we get any crashes..
>
> /Bjorn
>
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, kama wrote:
>
> >
> > Didnt get the time to upgrade the servers yesterday... But I managed to
> > write a Fedora 4 port. Ill test it today or tomorrow... now off to install
> > new servers.
> >
> > /Bjorn
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, kama wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hmm, I looked at our admin mailbox and it seems that I also gets a lot of
> > > crashes with the latest version of hlds. (30-50 per day) I'll try to
> > > upgrade to a newer glibc tomorrow and see if that will fixes the crash
> > > problem.
> > >
> > > /Bjorn
> > >
> > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, kama wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #0: Mon Apr 26 00:23:33 CEST 2004
> > > > kern.clockrate: { hz = 1000, tick = 1000, tickadj = 1, profhz = 1024,
> > > > stathz = 128 }
> > > > linux_base-8-8.0_4
> > > > glibc-2.3.2
> > > >
> > > > FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #1: Tue Dec 14 10:41:28 CET 2004
> > > > kern.clockrate: { hz = 1000, tick = 1000, tickadj = 1, profhz = 1024,
> > > > stathz = 128 }
> > > > linux_base-8-8.0_4
> > > > glibc-2.3.2
> > > >
> > > > FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Tue Jan 4 20:37:41 CET 2005
> > > > kern.clockrate: { hz = 10000, tick = 100, profhz = 1024, stathz = 128 }
> > > > linux_base-rh-9
> > > > glibc-2.3.2
> > > >
> > > > FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Wed Jun 8 22:14:07 CEST 2005
> > > > kern.clockrate: { hz = 2000, tick = 500, profhz = 1024, stathz = 128 }
> > > > linux_base-rh-9
> > > > glibc-2.3.2
> > > >
> > > > All these runs HL1...
> > > >
> > > > /Bjorn
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Gary wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Can you post some other info? Is it 5 or 4? What linux ABI are you
> > > > > using (redhat, slackware, etc) ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > At 02:46 AM 8/16/2005, kama wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >Could this cause choke on the server for us on FBSD? All my servers
> > > > > >chokes
> > > > > >even if there are a single hlds started. The server or the bandwidth
> > > > > >should not be a problem. The servers are connected to a 7609. It
> > > > > >should be
> > > > > >powerful enough. The chokes started to appear aprox the same time as
> > > > > >the
> > > > > >first upgrade of HL1 to support VAC2. The linux ABI kernel support
> > > > > >version
> > > > > >is 2.4.2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >compat.linux.osname: Linux
> > > > > >compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.2
> > > > > >compat.linux.oss_version: 198144
> > > > > >
> > > > > >/Bjorn
> > > > > >
> > > > > >On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Alfred Reynolds wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The problem appears to be a bug in the threading library exposed
> > > > > > > when
> > > > > > > two threads wait on two different condition variables at the same
> > > > > > > time.
> > > > > > > Depending on your OS and particular OS version the fix could be
> > > > > > > either
> > > > > > > upgrading GLIBC or upgrading your kernel (the 2.6.x series in
> > > > > > > Linux has
> > > > > > > integrated some threading support directly into the kernel, see
> > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_POSIX_Thread_Library and
> > > > > > > http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT6753699732.html ).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > SRCDS doesn't have this issue because it is not running the
> > > > > > > latest VAC
> > > > > > > client (it will soon however).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We are looking into other solutions (for example rewriting the
> > > > > > > code to
> > > > > > > remove the possibility of triggering the library bug) but we have
> > > > > > > no
> > > > > > > solid dates for an update. In the meantime you can upgrade your
> > > > > > > library/kernel versions to those reported to work by others on
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > list.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - Alfred
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----Original Message----
> > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of m0gely
> > > > > > > Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 11:05 PM To:
> > > > > > > [email protected] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux]
> > > > > > > Half-Life
> > > > > > > 1: Engine update released
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Gary wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Personally, I would make every effort to run 5, because as
> > > > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > others have said, it's not supported anymore, and has more
> > > > > > > > > fixes to
> > > > > > > > > the kernel (mpsafe net, more linux fixes etc)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > SRCDS runs fine though. I don't understand the problem here
> > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > I can get different results depending on what Linux ABI I
> > > > > > > > choose to
> > > > > > > > install. And (I think) the Linux ports are the same in 4.x or
> > > > > > > > 5.x.
> > > > > > > > Now, obviously there are others here that show having success
> > > > > > > > using
> > > > > > > > 5.x, but I think this is completely fruity that SRCDS works,
> > > > > > > > HLDS
> > > > > > > > doesn't, and now I have to got fetch a server, bring it home
> > > > > > > > and do a
> > > > > > > > major OS for such a problem.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > > > > > archives, please visit:
> > > > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >--
> > > > > >
> > > > > >...this page intentionally not left blank....
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >_______________________________________________
> > > > > >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > > > > >archives, please visit:
> > > > > >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > > > > archives, please visit:
> > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tune a fish.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > > > please visit:
> > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > My co-workers are idiots...
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > > please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > > Am I pretty? Tell me I'm pretty.
> > --
> >
> > if (female) printf("You are pretty");
> > --
> >
> > else printf("You are lonely");
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
>
> --
>
> Whoa...she's got a nice set of unary operators!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
> visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
--
You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tune a fish.
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
