-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] wow that looks cool dude. I mean it can take SS when there playing and stuff. Wow. How long does it take to send the pic? Can the server just send it to an ftp?
On 9/19/05, Christian Ingholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > EuroCSP, ssClient(http://ssclient.mine.nu) and VAC are what i use, and it > works like a charm > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mahmoud Foda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com> > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 1:52 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Re: hlds_linux digest, Vol 1 #4616 - 12 msgs > > > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > VAC is now the best anti cheat tool availible for HL games. I noticed > > this. > > Cheating Death used to be better but not anymore. HLGuard was good back > in > > the old WON days but not anymore. > > It would be great if valve lets us control some things in VAC. I think > > people who make scripts to change the way they play there game is bad > too. > > Its cheating just not with a HACK like no recoil scripts. Please valve, > > give > > VAC a punkbuster feel where we can restrict certain CVARs. Thats what we > > should ask instead of the old VAC. > > And incase anyone here hasn't noticed, this is linux. The linux kernal > can > > be compiled under the CPU you run so linux or unix is 64 bit ready. Its > > any > > CPU ready. > > > > On 9/16/05, Scott Pettit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> I agree it would be nice to have 64bit VAC2 available but anyone > relying > >> on VAC alone is mad. The only way to keep servers cheat free is with > >> good admins and some anti cheat software to help filter the unskilled > >> cheaters out. > >> > >> We run the 64bit versions of HLDS/SRCDS on our AMD64 servers and they > >> perform very very well, and not having VAC2 is only a very minor > problem > >> - hell, what did people do whilst VAC was suffering from a lack of > >> updates - we added more admins. > >> > >> If having VAC2 with 64bit is crucial to your business operation then > pay > >> Valve to do it, rather than complaining loudly about something that is > >> provided _FREE_. If you rely on another company for your own business > >> then there should always be some kind of SLA. > >> > >> -Scott > >> > >> Andrew Forsberg wrote: > >> > And, tbh, the hlds_amd and srcds_amd binaries work pretty well on > >> > opties > >> > atm. In fact, I'd put a small amount of money ($10NZD) on the 32 bit > >> > hlds builds working better now than the latest available 64 bit > builds. > >> > Despite Jussi/Hullu's efforts with regard to MM-P and MM mods. It > takes > >> > time to build something, it takes a lot of time to optimize it. Let > >> > them > >> > do their thing ffs. > >> > > >> > Anyhoo -- I'd rather Valve released things when they're ready than > put > >> > up with rubbish from certain other gaming companies who only provide > >> > full versions (cough ranked servers cough) to select companies in > >> > specific regions. I realize that's not strictly relevant. Just had to > >> > vent. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >> please visit: > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > > -- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
